解释"MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL"的语义
Network Working Group S. Bradner
Request for Comments: 2119 Harvard University
BCP: 14 March 1997
Category: Best Current Practice
Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels
......
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
定义技术文档的语法
Network Working Group D. Crocker, Ed.
Request for Comments: 2234 Internet Mail Consortium
Category: Standards Track P. Overell
Demon Internet Ltd.
November 1997
Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF
......
Network Working Group D. Crocker, Ed.
Request for Comments: 4234 Brandenburg InternetWorking
Obsoletes: 2234 P. Overell
Category: Standards Track THUS plc.
October 2005
Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF
......
Network Working Group D. Crocker, Ed.
Request for Comments: 5234 Brandenburg InternetWorking
STD: 68 P. Overell
Obsoletes: 4234 THUS plc.
Category: Standards Track January 2008
Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF
......
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
定义网络信息格式的头
RFC # 822
Obsoletes: RFC #733 (NIC #41952)
STANDARD FOR THE FORMAT OF
ARPA INTERNET TEXT MESSAGES
August 13, 1982
Revised by
David H. Crocker
Dept. of Electrical Engineering
University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19711
Network: DCrocker @ UDel-Relay
......
Network Working Group P. Resnick, Editor
Request for Comments: 2822 QUALCOMM Incorporated
Obsoletes: 822 April 2001
Category: Standards Track
Internet Message Format
......
Network Working Group P. Resnick, Ed.
Request for Comments: 5322 Qualcomm Incorporated
Obsoletes: 2822 October 2008
Updates: 4021
Category: Standards Track
Internet Message Format
Status of This Memo This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Abstract This document specifies the Internet Message Format (IMF), a syntax for text messages that are sent between computer users, within the framework of "electronic mail" messages. This specification is a revision of Request For Comments (RFC) 2822, which itself superseded Request For Comments (RFC) 822, "Standard for the Format of ARPA Internet Text Messages", updating it to reflect current practice and incorporating incremental changes that were specified in other RFCs.
......
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
定义网络信息body
Network Working Group N. Freed
Request for Comments: 2045 Innosoft
Obsoletes: 1521, 1522, 1590 N. Borenstein
Category: Standards Track First Virtual
November 1996
Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions
(MIME) Part One:
Format of Internet Message Bodies
......
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
定义多媒体网络信息类型
Network Working Group N. Freed
Request for Comments: 2046 Innosoft
Obsoletes: 1521, 1522, 1590 N. Borenstein
Category: Standards Track First Virtual
November 1996
Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions
(MIME) Part Two:
Media Types
......
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
非ascii信息头定义
Network Working Group K. Moore
Request for Comments: 2047 University of Tennessee
Obsoletes: 1521, 1522, 1590 November 1996
Category: Standards Track
MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) Part Three:
Message Header Extensions for Non-ASCII Text
......
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Network Working Group N. Freed
Request for Comments: 2049 Innosoft
Obsoletes: 1521, 1522, 1590 N. Borenstein
Category: Standards Track First Virtual
November 1996
Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions
(MIME) Part Five:
Conformance Criteria and Examples
......
----------------------------------------------------------------------
网络信息多媒体类型和规格注册流程
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) N. Freed
Request for Comments: 6838 Oracle
BCP: 13 J. Klensin
Obsoletes: 4288
Category: Best Current Practice T. Hansen
ISSN: 2070-1721 AT&T Laboratories
January 2013
Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures
Abstract
This document defines procedures for the specification and
registration of media types for use in HTTP, MIME, and other Internet
protocols.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Network Working Group N. Freed
Request for Comments: 4289 Sun Microsystems
BCP: 13 J. Klensin
Obsoletes: 2048 December 2005
Category: Best Current Practice
Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Four:
Registration Procedures
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Network Working Group R. Troost
Request for Comments: 2183 New Century Systems
Updates: 1806 S. Dorner
Category: Standards Track QUALCOMM Incorporated
K. Moore, Editor
University of Tennessee
August 1997
Communicating Presentation Information in
Internet Messages:
The Content-Disposition Header Field
Status of this Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Abstract
This memo provides a mechanism whereby messages conforming to the
MIME specifications [RFC 2045, RFC 2046, RFC 2047, RFC 2048, RFC
2049] can convey presentational information. It specifies the
"Content-Disposition" header field, which is optional and valid for
any MIME entity ("message" or "body part"). Two values for this
header field are described in this memo; one for the ordinary linear
presentation of the body part, and another to facilitate the use of
mail to transfer files. It is expected that more values will be
defined in the future, and procedures are defined for extending this
set of values.
This document is intended as an extension to MIME. As such, the
reader is assumed to be familiar with the MIME specifications, and
[RFC 822]. The information presented herein supplements but does not
replace that found in those documents.
This document is a revision to the Experimental protocol defined in
RFC 1806. As compared to RFC 1806, this document contains minor
editorial updates, adds new parameters needed to support the File
Transfer Body Part, and references a separate specification for the
handling of non-ASCII and/or very long parameter values.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) J. Reschke
Request for Comments: 6266 greenbytes
Updates: 2616 June 2011
Category: Standards Track
ISSN: 2070-1721
Use of the Content-Disposition Header Field in the
Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)
转载于:https://www.cnblogs.com/javaleon/p/3714047.html
原文链接：https://blog.csdn.net/weixin_30342827/article/details/94897149
本站声明:网站内容来源于网络,如有侵权,请联系我们,我们将及时处理。
还没有人抢沙发呢~